Martin: Based on usability studies I've seen, confirmation dialogs generally lead to two possible outcomes, neither of them desirable.
#Similar to eaglefiler mac
Prompting is still on the table too, but first we want to take a stab at making the workflow intelligibly undoable, see if we can make it work without another blocking alert.Īpple Mail Datacide E-mail Client Keyboard Shortcuts Mac macOS 11.0 Big Sur Microsoft Outlook We’ve changed ‘discard’ to cmd-escape (also closer to other outlooks which use plain esc) in beta ~Thursday and production next month. Looks like what ends up in the trash will be what was in the last auto save (~30 seconds) of the draft - it doesn’t do an additional save before discarding.
When I look in my Deleted Items folder, I see the drafts from when I tested this last night and just now, but none of the discarded drafts preserved the message text, and the subject line was only preserved in one. This is probably how it slipped through the cracks: it’s not really gone, so doesn’t meet the normal ‘must prompt’ criteria.
That draft is sitting in your ‘deleted items’ folder, ready to send. The good news is that ‘discard’ is not data loss. In New Outlook, it discards the message you have just finished writing - without warning or confirmation - where it disappears into the aether. In Apple’s Mail app, this is the shortcut for sending a message. One of the keyboard shortcuts changed in New Outlook compared to the “classic” Outlook app is Command–Shift–D.
#Similar to eaglefiler for mac
Microsoft has two different versions of Outlook in the Outlook for Mac app. Together displays the contents.New Outlook’s Dangerous “Discard” Shortcut (There may be others.) EagleFiler only displays an icon for OmniOutliner documents. I have encountered one document type where there is a difference. However, only EagleFiler can keep multiple libraries open at the same time.ĭocument previews – EagleFiler and Together display the contents of documents. Multiple libries – Both applications support multiple libraries. This would occasionally be useful, but it’s not a huge deal to me. To my knowledge, EagleFiler does not have this capability.
Import by reference – Together has the ability to track files by reference, meaning that it creates a link to imported files, rather than copying them. I don’t understand the details.) Recognizing and importing OpenMeta tags is a deal breaker for me. (Tag-a-Mac recommends only using EagleFiler to manage tags once imported into the library due to some differences in the way EagleFiler interacts with OpenMeta tags. EagleFiler does recognize OpenMeta tags, so imported files retain their tags in EagleFiler. Together does not recognize the OpenMeta tags, so tagged files need to be re-tagged. Both use the OpenMeta standard or methodology. Tag management – I tag my files using Leap, and tag emails using MailTags. I tend to prefer panes, but it’s not a deal breaker either way.
These functions are implemented as panes in Together. EagleFiler tends to use panes for things like the inspector, tag cloud, etc. Another difference is the use of palettes vs. These can be defined in EagleFiler, but EagleFiler will not have the pretty icons Together supplies. Together has some default collections (images, sounds, movies, etc.). The user choice may come down to personal taste. Some of the difference is in the design philosophy. Users interface – Some web reviews have mentioned a prettier user interface on Together. Here are some of the differences that I’ve noticed. The overall functionality is very similar. I’ve compared EagleFiler and Together from time to time. Anyone care to compare the two in terms of speed, stability, features? This would be very helpful.s
0 kommentar(er)
